Unix Programming - Re: C to Java Byte Code<---SPAM----IGNORE

Author

Re: C to Java Byte Code<---SPAM----IGNORE

Thomas G. Marshall

2004-10-18, 4:00 pm

napi coughed up:
> Maybe you would agree with me that a C compiler that directly
> produces Java Byte Code to be run on any JVM is something that is
> missing to software programmers so far. With such a tool one could
> stay with C and still be able to produce Java byte code for
> platform independent apps. Also, old programs (with some tweaking)
> could be re-compiled and ported to the JVM.
>
> We have been developing such a tool over the last 2 years and
> currently
> beta testing it.
>
> It's called MPC (for Multi-Platform C) and you can download the beta
> version at http://www.axiomsol.com or at
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/c2jvm/
>
> Napi

ok, now I /KNOW/ he's a sock puppet.

--
Iamamanofconstantsorrow,I'veseentroublea
llmydays.Ibidfarewelltoold
Kentucky,TheplacewhereIwasbornandraised.ForsixlongyearsI'vebeenin
trouble,NopleasureshereonearthIfound.ForinthisworldI'mboundtoramble,
Ihavenofriendstohelpmenow.... MaybeyourfriendsthinkI'mjustastrangerMyf
ace,
you'llneverseenomore. ButthereisonepromisethatisgivenI'llmeety
ouonGod's
goldenshore.

Alfred Newmane

2004-10-18, 4:00 pm

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> napi coughed up:
>
>
> ok, now I /KNOW/ he's a sock puppet.

Or at least just a spammer. Once was /more/ than enough for this sort of
thing.

(Though if it's a "sock puppet", who is the original identity? I
understand a "sock puppet" to be the same person under another name in
order to make it look like they have followers or just agreeing with
himself?)

Thomas G. Marshall

2004-10-18, 4:00 pm

Alfred Newmane coughed up:
> Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
>
> Or at least just a spammer. Once was /more/ than enough for this sort
> of thing.
>
> (Though if it's a "sock puppet", who is the original identity? I
> understand a "sock puppet" to be the same person under another name in
> order to make it look like they have followers or just agreeing with
> himself?)

I always thought a sock puppet was just an representative for a company,
human or automaton. {shrug} whatever. The internet is inventing terms and
accronyms faster than I can read about it.

--
"I don't want FOP, God dammit! I'm a DAPPER DAN MAN!"

Alfred Newmane

2004-10-18, 8:56 pm

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> Alfred Newmane coughed up:
>
> I always thought a sock puppet was just an representative for a
> company, human or automaton. {shrug} whatever. The internet is
> inventing terms and accronyms faster than I can read about it.

Too true, and the biggest problem on usenet is there are so many
definitions of some some what common usenet terms. Sure you have FAG and
"description" websites posted in soem groups, but I've seen many that
contradict each other in several ways. Oh well....., welcome to the
Internet :-)

Willem

2004-10-19, 9:05 am

Thomas wrote:
) I always thought a sock puppet was just an representative for a company,
) human or automaton. {shrug} whatever. The internet is inventing terms and
) accronyms faster than I can read about it.

I thought that to be a sock puppet, you would also have to appear to be an
independent person. IOW: a sock puppet is a fake identity that supports
whoever's hand is inside the sock.

SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

Alfred Newmane

2004-10-19, 3:58 pm

Willem wrote:
> Thomas wrote:
> ) I always thought a sock puppet was just an representative for a
> company, ) human or automaton. {shrug} whatever. The internet is
> inventing terms and ) accronyms faster than I can read about it.
>
> I thought that to be a sock puppet, you would also have to appear to
> be an independent person. IOW: a sock puppet is a fake identity that
> supports whoever's hand is inside the sock.

Yes, sounds about right; that is what I was tryign to get at, though
seems like you did it better :-)

firdaus

2004-10-25, 3:59 am

I've been reading the thread that were started by napi,
and the resulting comments with some humor.. whether his actions qualifies
as 'spam' is secondary to me, for now.

He's the real deal. Not some robot or someone else or socks or whatever
faking an identity. The reason I'm sure? I've been e-mailing with him
for quite some time now.

I've tried out MPC as a beta tester. It worked well enough for me to qualify
as a C compiler. He did told me that MPC supports a large subset
of ANSI C, though still not yet 100% compliant. But he said
eventually it will be there.

Tell you what guys..why don't you guys just register yourselves as beta
testers and try MPC out yourselves, rather than just extensively speculating..

I think this kind of product can still find its own niche market..

Alfred Newmane" <a.newmane.remove@eastcoastcz.com> wrote in message news:<2tkqsfF20r72qU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Willem wrote:
>
> Yes, sounds about right; that is what I was tryign to get at, though
> seems like you did it better :-)

Sponsored Links