Home > Archive > Compilers > April 2006 > Re: Berkeley yacc, was Looking for a Lex/Yacc free ebook
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Berkeley yacc, was Looking for a Lex/Yacc free ebook
|
|
|
| Thomas Dickey wrote:
> toby <toby@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> At the time I wrote it, bison insisted on using alloca(). But see below -
>
>
> yes - it does, but watching bug reports, I notice that it doesn't
> necessarily accept grammars that yacc did (whether this is a good
> thing or not appears to depend on your attitude).
>
>
> It would be nice if "-ansi" actually did what it's advertised.
In which of those three compilers? (One of which is all-ANSI, all the
time.) Why would a random ANSI compiler be more or less ANSI than gcc
or icc's "-ansi"?
(Bison 2.1 also builds with tcc, but the binary segfaults, which might
be my problem. :)
--Toby
>
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey
> http://invisible-island.net
> ftp://invisible-island.net
|
|
|
|
|