Home > Archive > Scheme > April 2006 > how to win big
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Tom Lord 2006-04-16, 4:03 am |
| Why aren't we collectively dogpiling on the "rails"[1] space?
-t
[1] as in "ruby on..."
| |
| rsheridan6@gmail.com 2006-04-16, 7:06 pm |
|
Tom Lord wrote:
> Why aren't we collectively dogpiling on the "rails"[1] space?
>
> -t
>
> [1] as in "ruby on..."
We have PLT's framework, SURFlets, SISCweb, Kahua, and Magic, and a few
others that are supposedly in the works, so you can't say that Schemers
are ignoring this space. But I doubt that any of these have the
resources behind them to become as full-featured as RoR anytime soon.
There's a lot of fragmentation and duplication of effort here, but
that's always the way it is with Scheme.
| |
| matthewknox@gmail.com 2006-04-17, 7:05 pm |
| Perhaps this is a useful thing for a summer-of-code project?
</shameless plug>
| |
| rsheridan6@gmail.com 2006-04-17, 7:05 pm |
|
matthewknox@gmail.com wrote:
> Perhaps this is a useful thing for a summer-of-code project?
> </shameless plug>
If there are any Scheme sponsers, it would be. Does LispNYC have any
interest in this, or does "Lisp" mean "Common Lisp?"
|
|
|
|
|