| Michael Erdmann 2004-09-27, 3:57 am |
| Anton van Straaten wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>
>
> I misunderstood the relationship of FDScript to FramerD, and client
> programs. According to the web site, "FDScript is a lightweight LISP
> interpreter which incorporates the FramerD kernel functions. It is
> appropriate for casual database access, writing command line scripts, and
> implementing CGI scripts for accessing FramerD databases from the World Wide
> Web."[1].
>
> The same page says "The FramerD libraries in LISP and Scheme are loaded to
> provide the same level of access as the C libraries, including network
> access, local caching, and FDScript execution." So I guess it's the Scheme
> access libraries you're talking about porting. What Schemes do they
> currently work with?
Yes, but this is also an open issue. I am not so convinced if it is
realy possible to seperate a client from the server. The actual
implementation seems to mixup both. I have to check this
with K. Haase.
Michael
>
> Anton
>
> [1] http://www.framerd.org/docs/why.html
>
>
|