Home > Archive > Prolog > April 2007 > Re: SWI-Prolog best choice for GPL-licensed Windows-compatible
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: SWI-Prolog best choice for GPL-licensed Windows-compatible
|
|
| Duncan Patton 2007-04-11, 7:04 pm |
| On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:52:47 +0200
bart demoen <bmd@cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>
> XSB and Yap have tabling: perhaps you can take advantage of that.
> XSB is more stable than Yap, Yap is faster.
>
My experience with XSB in the late '90s up until about 2001 was that
was it was quite unstable. This may have changed.
Dhu
| |
| Bart Demoen 2007-04-12, 4:04 am |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: nil.cs.kuleuven.ac.be
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ikaria.belnet.be 1176366578 9616 134.58.42.34 (12 Apr 2007 08:29:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@belnet.be
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:29:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20070113 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge10
X-Accept-Language: en
In-Reply-To: <20070411150446.dee90f7f.campbell@neotext.ca>
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.prolog:32039
Duncan Patton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:52:47 +0200
> bart demoen <bmd@cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> My experience with XSB in the late '90s up until about 2001 was that
> was it was quite unstable. This may have changed.
>
> Dhu
>
My experience is more recent. With XSB is more stable than Yap, I meant
specifically two things: (1) that I can lure new releases of Yap most often
into a segmentation fault. With XSB, I have to work harder. (2) both systems
evolve, and XSB's pace seems slower/more carefull/more reliable to me.
(1) and (2) might be related.
Cheers
Bart Demoen
|
|
|
|
|