For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Prolog > March 2005 > did prolog have any children that lived?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author did prolog have any children that lived?
alex goldman

2005-03-26, 3:57 pm

A 10+ year old book I'm reading mentions MU-prolog, NU-prolog and Prolog III
as more declarative possible successors to Prolog. I wonder what became of
them?


Bart Demoen

2005-03-28, 8:58 pm

alex goldman wrote:
> A 10+ year old book I'm reading mentions MU-prolog, NU-prolog and Prolog III
> as more declarative possible successors to Prolog. I wonder what became of
> them?
>
>


AFAIK, MU- and NU-Prolog are no longer maintained (in the sense of
evolving, being extended, enhanced ...).
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~lee/src/ says (about MU-Prolog): primarily of
historical interest.

Prolog III has a successor: Prolog VI.

In some sense, Erlang is a child of Prolog that still lives (very much).

Maybe Mercury could pass as a Prolog child - but the father of Mercury
might disagree :-)

Cheers

Bart Demoen
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com