Home > Archive > PostScript > May 2005 > Size of "image"-images' pixels
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Size of "image"-images' pixels
|
|
| Oliver Bandel 2005-05-10, 8:58 pm |
| Hello,
which size will a pixel have, that is used
with the image-operator?
Didn't found a specification for it.
TIA,
Oliver
P.S.: Why are those pixels not sharp displayed?
When I use the examples from the Bluebook,
I got smeared grafics, so there are not sharp
edges. Looks like aliasing or something like that..?!
| |
| Rod Dorman 2005-05-11, 8:57 am |
| In article <1115414000.431902@elch.in-berlin.de>,
Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>which size will a pixel have, that is used
>with the image-operator?
>
>Didn't found a specification for it.
Look in the PLRM in the Operator Details section.
The image is considered to exist in its own coordinate system, or
image space. The rectangular boundary of the image has its lower-left
corner at coordinates (0, 0) and its upper-right corner at (width,
height). The matrix operand defines a transformation from user space
to image space.
--
-- Rod --
rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com
|
|
|
|
|