Home > Archive > Fortran > March 2007
Pages: [1] 2
| Posts(7) | March 31, 2007, 7:21 pm | Newbie Question! | | Posts(1) | March 31, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(5) | March 31, 2007, 7:04 pm | reading back a partially-written record on direct access | | Posts(12) | March 31, 2007, 7:04 pm | copy and move files | | Posts(7) | March 30, 2007, 10:04 pm | Sample polling program code? | | Posts(11) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | undefined variable problem | | Posts(1) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(1) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(45) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | variable names for different fortrans | | Posts(9) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | Converting a string to reals | | Posts(1) | March 30, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(4) | March 30, 2007, 4:08 am | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(2) | March 28, 2007, 10:11 pm | funny variable names in gdb | | Posts(2) | March 28, 2007, 7:09 pm | unable to view symbols in gdb | | Posts(35) | March 28, 2007, 7:09 pm | Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!???? | | Posts(5) | March 28, 2007, 7:09 pm | How to read .csv file in fortran77? | | Posts(51) | March 28, 2007, 7:09 pm | http or tcp/ip | | Posts(9) | March 28, 2007, 7:09 pm | Fortran with a GUI?? | | Posts(11) | March 28, 2007, 4:18 am | howto find where a variable is initialized | | Posts(1) | March 28, 2007, 4:18 am | Re: Is C faster than fortran? | | Posts(7) | March 27, 2007, 10:09 pm | Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux | | Posts(4) | March 27, 2007, 7:09 pm | How to inspect an array value in gdb? | | Posts(1) | March 27, 2007, 7:09 pm | Fortran | | Posts(50) | March 27, 2007, 7:09 pm | Merits of fortran | | Posts(5) | March 26, 2007, 10:07 pm | Fortran90/95 Call tree | | Posts(3) | March 26, 2007, 10:07 pm | how to display the source file in ddd? | | Posts(2) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | FYI: Canaimasoft Web Site Back Up | | Posts(3) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | How do I make a library file with XLF? | | Posts(6) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran) | | Posts(5) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | how to call a file.out in a fortran file? | | Posts(1) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran) | | Posts(2) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran) | | Posts(13) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | declaring variables in the code | | Posts(1) | March 26, 2007, 7:05 pm | [Ann:] Fortran interface for GSL (alpha) | | Posts(1) | March 26, 2007, 8:29 am | Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran) | | Posts(1) | March 26, 2007, 4:08 am | Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran) | | Posts(4) | March 26, 2007, 4:08 am | how to get the gradient of a function? | | Posts(4) | March 26, 2007, 4:08 am | .mul ? what does it mean ? | | Posts(5) | March 25, 2007, 7:04 pm | Intel Fortran 9.1 | | Posts(18) | March 25, 2007, 7:04 pm | adding and displaying harmonic series | | Posts(25) | March 25, 2007, 8:03 am | increasing width | | Posts(2) | March 25, 2007, 8:03 am | Different results with same executable using openmp clause | | Posts(1) | March 25, 2007, 8:03 am | jxz | | Posts(1) | March 25, 2007, 1:52 am | VFTool - Powerful add-on for Visual Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 24, 2007, 8:04 am | ffnet 0.6 - neural networks and fortran | | Posts(10) | March 23, 2007, 7:04 pm | Equivalence of derived types with default initializers? | | Posts(3) | March 23, 2007, 7:04 pm | Libraries on Linux | | Posts(46) | March 23, 2007, 4:05 am | MR&C 7.9 | | Posts(4) | March 23, 2007, 4:05 am | Efficient arrays for artificial neural networks? | | Posts(6) | March 22, 2007, 10:03 pm | alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C | | Posts(6) | March 22, 2007, 7:04 pm | make | | Posts(31) | March 22, 2007, 7:04 pm | AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux) | | Posts(1) | March 22, 2007, 7:04 pm | Visual Fortran add-in program - VFTool 2.20 | | Posts(1) | March 22, 2007, 8:01 am | Wholesale latest brand name shoes, T-Shirt, Hats, Handbags,Jeans | | Posts(13) | March 22, 2007, 4:06 am | complex number & sort | | Posts(12) | March 21, 2007, 7:05 pm | integer factorization subroutine | | Posts(3) | March 21, 2007, 7:05 pm | g77 efficiency | | Posts(4) | March 21, 2007, 7:05 pm | Redefining intrinsic operators | | Posts(42) | March 21, 2007, 7:05 pm | Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time | | Posts(5) | March 21, 2007, 7:05 pm | About IMSL library and global variable | | Posts(18) | March 21, 2007, 5:42 am | iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression | | Posts(1) | March 21, 2007, 5:42 am | about IMSL library and global variable | | Posts(2) | March 20, 2007, 7:09 pm | Array of procedure pointers in F2003? | | Posts(2) | March 20, 2007, 7:09 pm | NAGWare Fortran 95 Syntax Checker Available online | | Posts(3) | March 20, 2007, 11:54 am | Guess what's sitting on my desk? | | Posts(25) | March 20, 2007, 4:23 am | Shellsort - initial swap size | | Posts(3) | March 19, 2007, 7:13 pm | Reading in a file as raw hex bytes? | | Posts(5) | March 19, 2007, 7:13 pm | Zombie Code -- Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer? | | Posts(15) | March 19, 2007, 8:09 am | Append to screen IO | | Posts(48) | March 18, 2007, 10:09 pm | Aren't the fuddy-duddies in the group going to comment on Fortress | | Posts(3) | March 17, 2007, 6:00 am | Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel | | Posts(8) | March 16, 2007, 10:05 pm | Sun Studio 12 early access compilers go live | | Posts(1) | March 16, 2007, 10:05 pm | Fortran language course | | Posts(4) | March 16, 2007, 10:05 pm | Wrong recipient (obviously!) Sorry, folks. | | Posts(4) | March 16, 2007, 10:05 pm | F2k8 BITS | | Posts(10) | March 16, 2007, 10:05 pm | F-compiler installation | | Posts(9) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | fortran equivalent of matlab num2str | | Posts(9) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | Need help with fortran file output | | Posts(10) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | Windows gfortran binaries | | Posts(5) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | Function kind attribute: valid fortran? | | Posts(12) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | g77 default array index starts at 0? | | Posts(17) | March 16, 2007, 7:07 pm | Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN | | Posts(2) | March 16, 2007, 4:31 am | Netcat and Fortran | | Posts(5) | March 16, 2007, 4:31 am | design question | | Posts(3) | March 15, 2007, 7:12 pm | Inverse of a square matrix | | Posts(2) | March 15, 2007, 7:11 pm | Merits of Fortran - followup summary | | Posts(2) | March 15, 2007, 7:11 pm | Debug Symbols missing in Intel Visual Fortran | | Posts(9) | March 15, 2007, 8:09 am | DDD and modules | | Posts(1) | March 15, 2007, 4:22 am | Beware the ides of march! | | Posts(2) | March 15, 2007, 4:22 am | Re: presentations at "Fifty Years of Fortran" | | Posts(31) | March 14, 2007, 7:12 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 14, 2007, 7:12 pm | Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel | | Posts(1) | March 14, 2007, 7:12 pm | TRANSFER on the derived types with allocatable components ( Was Benchmarking "tr | | Posts(1) | March 14, 2007, 7:12 pm | Re: TRANSFER on the derived types with allocatable components ( Was Benchmarking &quo | | Posts(1) | March 14, 2007, 7:12 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(14) | March 14, 2007, 8:08 am | using somebody else's function | | Posts(1) | March 14, 2007, 8:08 am | Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel | | Posts(3) | March 14, 2007, 4:18 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 13, 2007, 10:08 pm | Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel | | Posts(21) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | Using unused variables | | Posts(3) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | Benchmarking "transfer" | | Posts(6) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | Question to IBM xlf users | | Posts(11) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(13) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | Can allocatable dummies be optional? | | Posts(5) | March 13, 2007, 7:10 pm | using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 13, 2007, 11:22 am | How to read a data file consisting of character string and real numbers | | Posts(9) | March 12, 2007, 7:06 pm | reset the video buffer | | Posts(3) | March 12, 2007, 7:06 pm | Any free Fortran 90-95 compilers for Cray Y-MP ? | | Posts(5) | March 12, 2007, 7:06 pm | multiple precision arithmetic | | Posts(14) | March 12, 2007, 8:11 am | Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?) | | Posts(1) | March 11, 2007, 7:09 pm | F2k3 Translation - UML 2 Test Profile Example | | Posts(2) | March 10, 2007, 7:08 pm | More object-oriented programming, was Re: ... comment on Fortress | | Posts(1) | March 10, 2007, 7:08 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 10, 2007, 7:08 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing | | Posts(4) | March 10, 2007, 7:08 pm | Help! Fortran90 errata corrige | | Posts(3) | March 10, 2007, 5:00 pm | Re: dynamically growable vector? | | Posts(9) | March 10, 2007, 4:13 am | maxloc question | | Posts(4) | March 9, 2007, 10:06 pm | optional argument of elemental function | | Posts(5) | March 9, 2007, 10:06 pm | IVF quirks, or standard? | | Posts(2) | March 9, 2007, 10:06 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futu | | Posts(2) | March 9, 2007, 7:07 pm | generic deallocate possible? | | Posts(1) | March 9, 2007, 7:07 pm | warn about unused PRIVATE entities | | Posts(1) | March 9, 2007, 8:06 am | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(5) | March 9, 2007, 8:06 am | use of user defined types in Fortran 90 modules | | Posts(27) | March 9, 2007, 8:06 am | ANSI way to zero last few bits of doubles? | | Posts(1) | March 9, 2007, 8:06 am | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 9, 2007, 4:14 am | Help. Fortran 90 | | Posts(4) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | debugging segmentation faults (gfortran) | | Posts(2) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(7) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Extreme Newbie Help | | Posts(1) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | absoft fortran-mrwe application | | Posts(1) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing | | Posts(1) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(1) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: Object-oriented programing (was Re: How old is the average Fortran | | Posts(5) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Calling a dll c function returning a pointer | | Posts(15) | March 8, 2007, 7:05 pm | Cray-pointer-based array initialisation | | Posts(15) | March 8, 2007, 8:08 am | Problem using procedures and functions in modules | | Posts(8) | March 8, 2007, 4:18 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(2) | March 7, 2007, 10:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futu | | Posts(1) | March 7, 2007, 7:08 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(7) | March 7, 2007, 7:08 pm | Parameter usage in interface blocks | | Posts(1) | March 7, 2007, 7:08 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futu | | Posts(6) | March 7, 2007, 7:08 pm | need help making function elemental | | Posts(15) | March 7, 2007, 7:08 pm | converting a R code to fortran | | Posts(1) | March 7, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(18) | March 7, 2007, 7:07 pm | Division of large negative number leads to integer overflow | | Posts(4) | March 7, 2007, 8:26 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 7, 2007, 8:26 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(3) | March 6, 2007, 10:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 10:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(9) | March 6, 2007, 10:04 pm | Digital/Compaq/HP Visual Fortran on Windows 2000/XP | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(4) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(3) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | OMP Parallel for MS Visual Studio with Intel Fortran | | Posts(9) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | Pentiium 4 Math Functions | | Posts(2) | March 6, 2007, 7:05 pm | OT - 4 stager -- Launch Picture | | Posts(38) | March 6, 2007, 8:14 am | Optional arguments in nested subroutines | | Posts(3) | March 6, 2007, 4:23 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 4:23 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 6, 2007, 4:23 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(7) | March 6, 2007, 4:23 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(4) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(5) | March 5, 2007, 7:14 pm | Controlling excel from fortran | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 8:11 am | Re: Digital/Compaq/HP Visual Fortran on Windows 2000/XP | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 8:11 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(1) | March 5, 2007, 8:11 am | Re: Digital/Compaq/HP Visual Fortran on Windows 2000/XP | | Posts(15) | March 4, 2007, 11:41 pm | Array size by module variables | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 10:07 pm | Re: Digital/Compaq/HP Visual Fortran on Windows 2000/XP | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 10:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(3) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | 2D Graph Programme with ASCII Input | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futu | | Posts(2) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(14) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | ISO C Binding: Pointer to a pointer of pointers: ***argv | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | openMP reduction with arrays | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(2) | March 4, 2007, 7:07 pm | Where can I find the information such as.... | | Posts(2) | March 4, 2007, 8:10 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 4:05 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 4:05 am | Where can I find the information such as.... | | Posts(1) | March 4, 2007, 4:05 am | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(1) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to | | Posts(1) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(5) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(1) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur | | Posts(6) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | re-allocating an allocatable | | Posts(1) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back | | Posts(1) | March 3, 2007, 7:04 pm | Re: When will this ng come to accept that Fortran needs to go "back to the futur |
|
|