Home > Archive > Fortran > March 2006 > Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
|
|
| AN O'Nymous 2006-03-31, 8:01 am |
|
Richard Maine wrote:
> AN O'Nymous <a_n_onymous80@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Point 1. This is a legal question.
>
> Comp.lang.fortran isn't a very good place to ask legal questions. We
> often discuss the "legality" of Fortran code, but that's a sloppy,
> informal use of the word (even though I use it that way myself.)
Sorry mate. I seem to hardly ever get replies when I post to uk.legal.
They seem to be a snotty lot who killfile legally ignorant people there
easily...or have had too much bad experience with too many trolls and
are quick to (wrongly) prejudge, take your pick.
I promise my next few posts here will be on topic :-)
| |
| Richard E Maine 2006-03-31, 7:01 pm |
| AN O'Nymous <a_n_onymous80@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I seem to hardly ever get replies when I post to uk.legal.
Ah. I hadn't noticed the uk bit. It was right there in front of me, but
I hadn't noticed anyway. Whatever the answer is, it is probably
different in the uk than over here (usa) anyway.
Sounds to me like you got a good pointer from Joost, though.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain| experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|