| Posts(5) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | import selected module variables within that module's procedures |
| Posts(13) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | Help, Can't find my bug |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | Re: Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : |
| Posts(9) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | make i:j equivalent to [(k,k=i,j)]? |
| Posts(7) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | Re: Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:04 pm | Re: Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : Access violation er |
| Posts(4) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Bus error/ segmentation fault--help? |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : Access violation er |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Free software: Fortran (or C or ADMB) data to R |
| Posts(10) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : Access violation er |
| Posts(22) | October 31, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 31, 2006, 4:00 am | Unhandled exception in SWilk.exe (SWilk2.dll) (0 xC0000005) : Access violation error |
| Posts(13) | October 31, 2006, 4:00 am | io-unit has been opened |
| Posts(7) | October 30, 2006, 9:59 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | completely static runtime environment |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | FORALL STATEMENT |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: fortran program reading an external text (and numbers) file and writing with edit |
| Posts(15) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Help needed |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: fortran program reading an external text (and numbers) file and writing with edit |
| Posts(7) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | F77 IO, multiple outputs per line |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: fortran program reading an external text (and numbers) file and writing with edit |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | fortran program reading an external text (and numbers) file and writing with edits |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: fortran program reading an external text (and numbers) file and writing with edit |
| Posts(4) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | How to decide using COMMON block variables or function/subroutine |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | IEEE intrinsic modules |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(4) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | questions about RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS |
| Posts(4) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | array valued function ? |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Does the value inside DO loop still accessible when control jumps |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | UU |
| Posts(4) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | printing octal |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Does the value inside DO loop still accessible when control jumps out of the loop |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(5) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Any fortran codes on IntegroDifferential Equation? |
| Posts(6) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | How to deal with such ODE with fortran? |
| Posts(5) | October 30, 2006, 7:16 pm | Assigning values to a derived type (structure constructor?) |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(5) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | F77 HP extension PARAMETER |
| Posts(6) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Pointer Arguments |
| Posts(4) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: How to decide using COMMON block variables or function/subroutine parameters? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(7) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | programming -- keep things simple |
| Posts(6) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | variable case expressions?? |
| Posts(15) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | gfortran derived types |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(8) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | triangular wave |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(9) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | arrays of variable size |
| Posts(30) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Q: Aligning data with cache lines in fortran 95 ? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(9) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | How to use syscall in Fortran90/95? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: How Many Processor Cores Are Enough? |
| Posts(3) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | C, Fortran77 sources, gcc and gfortran... |
| Posts(6) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | #define in fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: How Many Processor Cores Are Enough? |
| Posts(6) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(34) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Features chosen for Fortran 2008 |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?; Now : Programming practices |
| Posts(1) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 30, 2006, 7:15 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(12) | October 24, 2006, 8:01 am | seeking advice for "translate" Fortran code to Java code |
| Posts(22) | October 24, 2006, 3:59 am | intrinsic elemental math functions |
| Posts(3) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(10) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | gfortran and "Type/rank mismatch" |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(17) | October 23, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(3) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | input matrix for blas and lapack |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(6) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: rrspacing at 0. and subnormals |
| Posts(15) | October 23, 2006, 4:01 am | Formatted output and new_line('a') on "\r\n" systems |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 10:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(12) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | integral along a hyperbola |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | Re: object-oriented software (was Re: Features chosen for Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | object-oriented software (was Re: Features chosen for Fortran 2008) |
| Posts(3) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | echo in makefile |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 7:03 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 8:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 8:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(9) | October 22, 2006, 8:01 am | Happy Birthday Fortran! |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(5) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | Another question about the intelligence of compiler |
| Posts(8) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | compile concern |
| Posts(17) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | intrinsic logical to integer conversion? |
| Posts(16) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | same progams give different results, why? |
| Posts(4) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | ABSOFT FORTRAN v10 COMPILER |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2006, 4:05 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2006, 10:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2006, 10:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2006, 7:01 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 20, 2006, 7:02 pm | input matrix |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(3) | October 20, 2006, 7:02 pm | Intel Visual Fortran in x64 |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2006, 4:05 am | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 9:59 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 9:59 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(9) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | defaultlib "libc.lib" conflicts with |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(9) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Please help a newbie about FORMAT statement |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(10) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Help on some run-time error with ifort compiler. |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 7:00 pm | Please help a newbie about FORMAT statement |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 8:00 am | Help on some run-time error with ifort compiler. |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2006, 4:14 am | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(10) | October 19, 2006, 4:14 am | Problem using BLAS' xGEMM |
| Posts(2) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | seeking advice for "translate" Fortran code to Java code |
| Posts(4) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | help on ifort compiler |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(6) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Vector instruction support in G95 or Gfortran? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(3) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(4) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: This is not a troll. I like Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:02 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(17) | October 18, 2006, 7:59 am | The intelligence of compiler |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 7:59 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(8) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | gfortran vs. g77 |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2006, 4:01 am | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 8:56 pm | How to solve "There has been an internal compiler error (C0000005)." |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:57 pm | how to solve "warning LNK4084:" |
| Posts(3) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | hot key to change windows in CVF |
| Posts(5) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Running another program within Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: READ-statement and a segmentation fault |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(2) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(16) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Constant expressions and mathematical functions |
| Posts(2) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Compaq Visual Fortran VB6 dll |
| Posts(2) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Compaq Fortran dll not found error |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks? |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: This is not a troll. I like Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: This is not a troll. I like Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: Newton's method in a different-looking fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: This is not a troll. I like Fortran |
| Posts(1) | October 17, 2006, 7:00 pm | Re: This is not a troll. I like Fortran |