For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Fortran > October 2006 > Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?
Jan Vorbrüggen

2006-10-30, 7:15 pm

>>Then again, the dominant style in C these days is using quite long
> and people want to be able to call those C routines without having to
> map the names to something else. I didn't define those names. I
> personally think them ludicrous. But they exist, and the Fortran
> standard increased its name length limit to accomodate them.


Of course, part of the problem is C++ and its inability to get proper support
from the linker/loader for overloading of functions and procedure, which leads
to the abominable practice of name mangling. Bah pfui!

> I'll also note that I continue to disagree with the claim that
> readability didn't suffer from the 6-character limit.


Quite so.

Jan
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com