| Author |
"Compaq FORTRAN ver. 7.0" misprint?
|
|
| awgreynolds@earthlink.net 2005-06-04, 3:57 pm |
| This link mentions a Compaq version of Fortran for Windows that I have
never heard of:
http://www.opticalres.com/cv/cvhw_f.html
Is it a misprint, or do they really mean Intel or does it really exist?
Al Greynolds
| |
| Gary L. Scott 2005-06-04, 8:57 pm |
| awgreynolds@earthlink.net wrote:
> This link mentions a Compaq version of Fortran for Windows that I have
> never heard of:
>
> http://www.opticalres.com/cv/cvhw_f.html
>
> Is it a misprint, or do they really mean Intel or does it really exist?
>
> Al Greynolds
>
Probably Intel Fortran version 7 or later...
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@ev1.net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
Why are there two? God only knows.
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
| |
| e p chandler 2005-06-04, 8:57 pm |
| Gary L. Scott wrote:
> awgreynolds@earthlink.net wrote:
> Probably Intel Fortran version 7 or later...
So why is Microsoft Visual C/C++ Version 5 listed? (I've never heard of
5, just 4 and 6.)
| |
| Gary L. Scott 2005-06-05, 3:57 am |
| e p chandler wrote:
> Gary L. Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> So why is Microsoft Visual C/C++ Version 5 listed? (I've never heard of
> 5, just 4 and 6.)
>
I'm not sure...a google search on MSVC version 5 turns up lots of hits
though.
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@ev1.net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
Why are there two? God only knows.
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
|
|
|
|