Fortran - Re: Namespace suggestion

Author

Re: Namespace suggestion

Pierre Asselin

2005-12-05, 7:04 pm

Colin Watters <qolin.see_signature@nowhere.co.uk> wrote:

> There's little to stop you (if you really want to) from defining module
> variables as members of an overall structure. EG.

> [ snip ]

> This would require use of mmm%aa instead of just aa.

Okay for variables, but no good for mmm%subroutine(...).

--
pa at panix dot com

Richard Maine

2005-12-05, 7:04 pm

Pierre Asselin <pa@see.signature.invalid> wrote:

> Colin Watters <qolin.see_signature@nowhere.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> Okay for variables, but no good for mmm%subroutine(...).

until f2003, which has procedure pointers with that syntax. One would
have to set up the pointer in executable code, but that's doable. I'm
not particularly advocating for this approach - just noting it.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain

Sponsored Links