Home > Archive > Fortran > December 2005 > forall/where and openmp
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
forall/where and openmp
|
|
| Ushnish Basu 2005-06-11, 3:57 am |
| Hi,
Just wanted to check: is it OK to mix OpenMP parallelisation and compiler
parallelisation (using forall etc.) in Fortran 95? Is it compiler dependent? I
presume having a forall inside a '!$omp parallel do' doesn't count as nested
parallelisation, in terms of problems with OpenMP?
Incidentally, I am using ifort8
Thanks,
Ushnish
--
Ushnish Basu ubasu@ce.berkeley.edu
+1 510 644-1906 www.ce.berkeley.edu/~ubasu
| |
| robert.corbett@sun.com 2005-06-11, 3:57 am |
| Since a Fortran 95 compiler is not required to support
OpenMP, I would say it is compiler-dependent.
Bob Corbett
| |
| Tim Prince 2005-06-11, 3:57 am |
| Ushnish Basu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to check: is it OK to mix OpenMP parallelisation and compiler
> parallelisation (using forall etc.) in Fortran 95? Is it compiler dependent? I
> presume having a forall inside a '!$omp parallel do' doesn't count as nested
> parallelisation, in terms of problems with OpenMP?
>
> Incidentally, I am using ifort8
>
I don't think ifort 8 would parallelize forall() automatically, nor do I
think it would do a a nested automatic parallelization inside a
successful OpenMP parallelization. It's certainly not defined by
Fortran 95.
| |
| shadowman7 2005-12-25, 10:34 pm |
| I want to download the lastest version of OpenMP!!
Who can help me, please give me link to download !!
Thanks very much !!
(I want install OpenMP on Debian)
If perhap, please send it (the lastest version) to my mail box: nguyendinhhung_vn@yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|