| Michael Baldwin Bruce 2004-09-25, 4:00 am |
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<QXH4d.18324$OB2.5559@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Jason Bowen writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On what basis do you make that claim, Bowen? Doesn't your therapist
> deal with the "real emotional issues"?
>
>
>
>
> Non sequitur.
>
>
>
>
> Non sequitur, given that the issue is your erroneous claim of
> stalking, not responding to someone who made an ironic posting.
>
>
>
>
> You're erroneously presupposing some pretense on my part, Bowen.
>
>
>
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>
>
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>
>
>
> Non sequitur.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Non sequitur.
>
>
> Non sequitur, and rather ironic, coming from someone with behavior
> identical to that on which he was commenting, namely responding to
> someone who neither addressed him nor talked about him. Demonstrates
> "real emotional issues", according to your reckless reasoning.
can a sequitur, ipso facto, be half non sequitur, bruce?
oh la de da, oh la de de, he's bruce the half a sequitur.
|