Home > Archive > Fortran > May 2004 > equivalent of integer*8 in fortran 90
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
equivalent of integer*8 in fortran 90
|
|
| Kamaraju Kusumanchi 2004-05-15, 7:32 pm |
| Hi gurus,
I am reading the fftw3 manual and in the manual says that the plan
variable be declared with integer*8 (pg 49, section 6.1). I would like
to know if this is OK or should I go for integer(I4B) where
I4B = selected_int_kind(9)
Could you please advise upon which is better?
thanks in advance
raju
| |
| James Van Buskirk 2004-05-15, 11:31 pm |
| "Kamaraju Kusumanchi" <kk288@cornell.edu> wrote in message
news:c864md$e1g$1@news01.cit.cornell.edu...
> I am reading the fftw3 manual and in the manual says that the plan
> variable be declared with integer*8 (pg 49, section 6.1). I would like
> to know if this is OK or should I go for integer(I4B) where
> I4B = selected_int_kind(9)
> Could you please advise upon which is better?
It's not a question of better or worse, it's a question of
functioning at all. INTEGER*8 is much more likely to
correspond to selected_int_kind(18).
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
| |
| Donald Arseneau 2004-05-16, 1:31 am |
| "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> writes:
> "Kamaraju Kusumanchi" <kk288@cornell.edu> wrote in message
> news:c864md$e1g$1@news01.cit.cornell.edu...
>
>
>
>
> It's not a question of better or worse, it's a question of
> functioning at all. INTEGER*8 is much more likely to
> correspond to selected_int_kind(18).
Of course "I4B" corresponds to (nonstandard) integer*4
Donald Arseneau asnd@triumf.ca
|
|
|
|
|