| Markus 2007-07-30, 4:14 am |
|
> Markus E.L. wrote:
>
>
> I'm not saying I think it's particularly effective or smart advertising-
> though Jon likes it.
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp...68e2aa891dbbf1b
I get:
Topic not found
We're sorry, but we were unable to find the topic you were looking
for. Perhaps the URL you clicked on is out of date or broken?
> "We'll concentrate on releasing free content on our website and
> referencing it from news articles instead, as this is much more
> productive."
Also googling for this sentence or major parts of it doesn't give me
any results.
> (There was I think a more direct admission, IIRC when Harrop was
> responding to Ken Tilton somewhere, that's just the first I found when I
> wasted some lunchtime searching, spending much time reading hundreds of
> Harrop and Tilton posts is not exactly appealing)
Rumours are not admissible evidence here.
>
>
> His inflaming and restarting old and well-explored arguments greatly
> reduces any intellectual effort he would require to write up, and of
> course there's simple direct cut/paste reuse of content, sometimes
> only apparent if you encounter Jon in multiple fora.
I do. It doesn't become apparent. Maybe I'm suffering from amnesia or
perhaps you're seeing patterns where non exist. The idea of the
spammer who, to camouflage his spamming, spents major amounts of time
to produce original content doesn't strike me as convincing yet. It's
wouldn't be efficient.
Regards -- Markus
|