For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Functional > July 2007 > Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural
Markus

2007-07-27, 8:05 am



> 3. Jon often posts to c.l.l *only* (i.e., without also posting to c.l.f.)


First time I hear somebody being critised for _not_ cross posting.

> 4. Jon's often posts about ocaml to c.l.l *only*.


You sure the word "Lisp" was totally absent from those posts? And they
were thread starters? Hm.

> Jon should post to c.l.f. about ocaml but he doesn't - why? Because
> comparatively few people read or post to c.l.f. and Jon's aim is to
> reach as many potential customers has possible.


Don't you think the entrenched Lisp community is exactly that (customers) not?

And thanks for bringing all that to c.l.f. BTW: Does that qualify as
spam by your questionnaire? I can't decide from the top off my head.

Regards -- Markus




Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2009 codecomments.com