For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Functional > July 2007 > Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural
Markus

2007-07-27, 8:05 am


> development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de (Markus E.L.) writes:
>
>
> The sig is only a problem because of his other behaviour. As I said


Behaviour? Perhaps just write to his teacher ... :-/. People, grow
up. This is usenet: The only way to enforce is not to respond. Since
c.l.l. obviously can't ignore JH's posts the problem AND there are
people who don't want them, this is a c.l.l. problem. And you will
have to live with it. And perhaps better not attack other people too,
who happen to defend Jon. And, last, to go back to the beginning of
these threads: No reason to bring your venom to c.l.f.

> before, his posts probably fit better for comp.lang.functional. On the


Maybe. On the other side (without researching what Jon actaully
posted), I find it somehow doubtful that discussion of limits and
weaknesses of lisp won't have a place on c.l.l. In comparison:
Certainly I don't want to see discussions on the (suppossed or real)
weaknesses of GC and FP take place only at c.l.ada (they are biased),
but rather in c.l.f.

> other hand, I am reading comp.lang.lisp (no followups set there, so I
> probably won't read answers to this message).


My rule is: You post accusations / judgements on people on group X,
you read my answer there. I've been ignoring the follow-ups in this
threads consistently, especially if people post from and to c.l.l. and
set f'up to c.l.f. That is the curse of crossposting.

Call me a troll. :-) You wouldn't be the first one.

> Maybe you can understand
> that I do not want to hear the continued promotion of OCaml and F# in a
> lisp newsgroup. (And, BTW, it is often a very brain-dead promotion,
> because the guy deliberately refuses to understand other people arguments.)


My impression is, that there are two parties that don't want to
understand. I have seen enough instances of JH listening to arguements
that I wonder why the "problem" is so prevalent in c.l.l.

Regards -- Markus

( Whom the style of the JH opposition alone already has convinced
that the problem is not JH alone. )


Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2009 codecomments.com