For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Functional > July 2007 > Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural
Markus

2007-07-27, 4:17 am


> Markus E.L. wrote:
>
> You can do objective and quantitative tests by writing equivalent programs
> in different languages and measuring their verbosity, e.g. the ray tracer,
> the symbolic simplifier, the Minim interpreter.


I think you got the message :-). I don't think those test provide
really hard irrefutable data, but at least some material for further
discussion and pondering. What I find so repugnant in many language
advocacy discussion how people already just know what is true and
right and so few ever are willing to go into formulating meaningful
questions and considering them in a more scientific spirit (meaning,
actually looking for answers instead of knowing them and trying to
convince the rest of the world. In my opinion that is what
distinguishes science from politics, not wether one got a research
grant or a PHD :-)).

Regards -- Markus





Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2009 codecomments.com