| Markus 2007-07-26, 10:05 pm |
|
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>
> Don't be,
>
> It is rather simple, if you want to build a house there are is a long
> list of 'environmental contraints' to it'sconstruction, like geology,
> climate, availability and cost of materials, ease of maintenance and
> change, to name just a few.
> A good designed house can have a timberframe or reinforced concrete as the
> base structure, both give an livingspave when finished, or any other
> basic-structure for that matter.
> But if someone sells rebar, he will loath a timberframe as a
> wood salesman wil pity any concrete setup.
> Of course there are some drawbacks as to ease of change, which, with both,
> can be a horror or a blessing, it just depends how often you want to go
> through that ordeal.
Ah, I see. There is no need to actually give arguments against Jon's
position: It's automatically discredited by the fact that he makes a
living from his know-how which also implies that he MUST be
wrong. Absolutely.
We should probably handle our relationship to medical doctors the same
way: Not believing their diagnosis since they are -- GASP -- earning
money from their practice.
Or just wait -- now I see, it's all because Jon has no timber
reinforced concrete in his base structure libraries and is trying to
push a rebar book. It's all about architecture. Now there!
Well, well.
Regards -- Markus
|