| Alistair 2008-02-26, 6:55 pm |
| On 26 Feb, 15:49, "Judson McClendon" <ju...@sunvaley0.com> wrote:
> "William M. Klein" <wmkl...@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
to[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>
>
re have been ZERO " children" killed as a result of that[color=darkred]
n the US today, no CHILDREN have been killed by this.[color=darkred]
>
> Please note that I said "unborn children". Do you say that the unborn
> babies who are alive right now are not the children of their mother?
> Many of them (partial birth abortions) were killed seconds before full
> birth. By what twisted perverted logic does one say that a baby that is
> being born, and all it's body is outside the mother's body except for
> part of the head, is not a child of the mother? Obviously, the twisted
> and perverted logic that permits one to murder their own flesh and
> blood for the sake of convenience.
> --
> Judson McClendon =A0 =A0 =A0 ju...@sunvaley0.com (remove zero)
> Sun Valley Systems =A0 =A0http://sunvaley.com
> "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
> whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."- Hid=
e quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Unborn children are not children. They might be blastocysts or even
foetuses but until born they are not children. I find it interesting
that you mention killing babies where the head is still in utero and
the body already expelled. Perhaps I can help? In the UK we would
ensure that such breach births are dealt with by caesarean operations.
Usually this works out fine for baby and mother.
So, what really is going on in the births that you mention? I presume
that you have a maximum age limit before termination is disallowed or
are you putting a pro-life/anti-abortion slant on it?
|