| Alistair 2008-01-30, 6:56 pm |
| On 28 Jan, 09:42, roger.pea...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Jan 26, 11:17=A0pm, "Pete Dashwood"
>
> <dashw...@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>
> ...snipped the entire post in order to respond to...
>
>
>
>
>
>
...[color=darkred]
>
>
>
>
[color=darkred]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My dear, dear boy; I think I do. =A0How often have I heard someone try
> that one!
>
[color=darkred]
>
> <yawn> =A0Another tired old ploy, deployed by those who post endlessly
> as an excuse whenever any of their nonsense is snipped, however
> lightly.
>
> The only person snipping everything substantive, in order to call
> names, is you.
>
>
> Yes, I thought that you wouldn't like a reasoned debate where you
> couldn't control the terms of debate to pre-determine the conclusion,
> and would have to argue with someone who knew the facts as well as
> you. =A0Sorry to discover that I was right.
>
> Learn some honesty.
>
> Roger Pearse- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Observing your interplay with PD I can only conclude that you are the
one making meaningless jeers. Consider each of your points above: if
you are being honest and have sen 'such nonsense/ploys' before then at
least outline, for our education, the play and interplay to which you
allude and explain why you stand superior to those here.
|