| Alistair 2008-01-30, 6:56 pm |
| On 28 Jan, 09:38, roger.pea...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Jan 27, 3:18=A0pm, "Charles Hottel" <chot...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
[color=darkred]
>
>
>
>
d in[color=darkred]
e.[color=darkred]
00[color=darkred]
it[color=darkred]
e[color=darkred]
>
me[color=darkred]
im.[color=darkred]
>
[color=darkred]
that[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
any[color=darkred]
part[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
med[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
ical[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
"[color=darkred]
>
>
>
>
>
>
l at[color=darkred]
>
> <smile> Oh dear.
>
>
[color=darkred]
>
>
want[color=darkred]
>
> (irrelevant repost snipped)
>
> <chortle> =A0Please, don't bother with this kind of nonsense. =A0We all
> know the trick of phrasing jeers as questions. =A0To pretend otherwise
> is disingenuous.
>
> But I suppose, if you can't deal with my comments, and don't want to
> discuss even the way in which the issue is being setup, then you most
> certainly don't have to!
>
> All the best,
>
> Roger Pearse- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Perhaps you could be honest about yourself. Who are you, what is your
interest and authority in these matters?
|