| Alistair 2008-01-29, 6:56 pm |
| On 26 Jan, 15:48, "Judson McClendon" <ju...@sunvaley0.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't referring specifically to your post. I've just seen
> so many posts where people make statements implying that Einstein did
> to Newton what Copernicus did to Ptolemy, I appreciated Pete's post
> setting it straight. As Pete pointed out, Newton wasn't "wrong," he
> was simply "incomplete" for some situations he had no way to know
> about. As Pete alluded in his last line, there is certainly more to
> come. Who knows what may come out of quantum mechanics in the next 50
> years? A unified field theory would be nice. Perhaps even a Theory of
> Everything. Even God says pretty much anything is possible (Genesis
> 11:6). :-)
I wonder if a grand universal theory would be able to disprove the
existence of god? You might have to resort to nipping out to an extra
dimension to avopid that one.
|