| Alistair 2008-01-29, 6:56 pm |
| On 25 Jan, 16:55, "Charles Hottel" <chot...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> "Alistair" <alist...@ld50macca.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:0731a576-2cd4-4d27-8ab2-b25060eabecb@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On 25 Jan, 01:31, "Charles Hottel" <chot...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
in[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
t[color=darkred]
>
[color=darkred]
..[color=darkred]
>
at[color=darkred]
y[color=darkred]
rt[color=darkred]
d[color=darkred]
al[color=darkred]
>
[color=darkred]
e[color=darkred]
>
> Is that a reference to the Q manuscript (preceding two of the gospels)?
>
> IIRC it has to do with the idea that the J manuscript and the Court Histor=
y
> of Davis may have be written by the same author. Page 12 of the book lists=
> the verses that the author believes make up one coherent complete story.
> There are words and phrases that occur throughout that do not occur
> elsewhere. It is a flowing, continuous story. There are quotations,
> allusions, puns and a variety of literary devices that show they originall=
y
> went together. =A0It was the Bible's editors who broke the unity and
> continuity of this work by mixing other works into it.
Thanks.
|