| roger.pearse@googlemail.com 2008-01-28, 3:55 am |
| On Jan 26, 11:17=A0pm, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashw...@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote:
> <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:af6a739a-fa88-4770-898c-f252c097b6b0@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 26, 1:40 pm, "Pete Dashwood"
=2E..snipped the entire post in order to respond to...
> <dashw...@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>
[color=darkred]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Would that were true.
>
> [Pete:]=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> You don't know me.
My dear, dear boy; I think I do. How often have I heard someone try
that one!
> You claim to enjoy reasoned debate, but you have snipped my responses...
<yawn> Another tired old ploy, deployed by those who post endlessly
as an excuse whenever any of their nonsense is snipped, however
lightly.
The only person snipping everything substantive, in order to call
names, is you.
> This conversation is terminated.
Yes, I thought that you wouldn't like a reasoned debate where you
couldn't control the terms of debate to pre-determine the conclusion,
and would have to argue with someone who knew the facts as well as
you. Sorry to discover that I was right.
Learn some honesty.
Roger Pearse
|