Cobol - Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed

You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author

Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and

Robert

2007-09-24, 3:55 am

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:13:23 +1200, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@removethis.enternet.co.nz>
wrote:

>"Robert" <no@e.mail> wrote in message
> news:gqfdf3tp66qpm4hcold28fmhh5um18v77d@
4ax.com...
><snip>>
>
>It demonstrates that in THAT place, at THAT time, half the code was
>superfluous. You cannot extend that to ALL (or even ANY) other sites.

If generalizations were invalid (including this one), employers wouldn't ask how many
years of experience you have. Whatever you learned previously doesn't apply.

For that matter, CLC shouldn't exist. Expert knowledge from previous experience doesn't
apply to today's problems.

Sponsored Links