For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > July 2007 > Re: Hard Copy reports









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Hard Copy reports
klshafer@att.net

2007-07-09, 9:55 pm

On Jul 9, 3:41 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:01:58 -0700, "klsha...@att.net"
>
> <klsha...@att.net> wrote:
>
> I notice the sign in the locker room saying "Not Responsible for Lost
> or Stolen Items". I take this to mean primarily "Please do not sue
> us". While their legal protection is probably a little more, their
> biggest protection is in persuading us to be a bit more responsible.


Exactly. The other feeling I remember having is along the lines of,
"I've just paid a hundred dollars an hour for an expert opinion. I
deserve to know for sure that it was the CPA herself who wrote this
up, and who is responsible for it, and not just some intern sending
out the text under the CPA's letterhead."

I believe it is this kind of accountability which is behind the
"signature requirement", whether it be ink-pen or ER/ES (established
by secure password.)

Ken

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com