Home > Archive > Cobol > March 2007 > US - TX - Need Mainframe Data Architect in Iowa
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
US - TX - Need Mainframe Data Architect in Iowa
|
|
| Global Infotech Corporation 2007-03-17, 3:55 am |
|
We are looking for a Mainframe Data Architect with very good background in
DB2 / IMS-DB, COBOL, JCL CICS etc Must have at least 6 or more years
experience as a Mainframe Consultant.
Pay Rate: US$ 41.25 - 49.50/hr (W2, No benefits or relocation assistance);
final rate will be decided following interview
Job Location is at Des Moines, IA
Duration: 12 mths+
Contact-to-hire option: Yes
Residency Requirements: US citizens or US Permanent Residents or candidates
eligible for employment in US for any employer, without any work visa
sponsorship.
If you are interested in exploring this opportunity or know of any
acquaintance who may be, please forward this requirement to him / her.
HOW TO APPLY: Interested applicants should reply to this posting, keeping
the same "subject line"; only one MS Word resume (.DOC file) attachment
accepted. Submitted resumes should include applicant's current physical
location, availability, telephone no/e-mail ID, best time to call and
expected salary rate beneath the name at the top of the resume. ** NO COVER
LETTERS PLEASE **
ABOUT GLOBAL INFOTECH CORPORATION
Founded in 1996, Global Infotech (Global) is a US-based, IT services
corporation with an unwavering focus on its customers' needs. Headquartered
in the Silicon Valley of California, Global Infotech delivers high quality,
high security and cost effective end-to-end software and hi-tech solutions
to its customers that include Fortune 500, mid-sized companies and new
economy businesses in North America.
Since inception, Global continues to constantly deliver on its philosophy to
be customer focused, technologically aligned, quality conscious, process
driven and result oriented. Global has a knowledgeable and dedicated
management team with vast experience and a successful track record spanning
over the last three decades. The management team closely interacts with the
customers to understand their current and long-term strategic goals and
requirements to provide better service. For further details, please visit us
at our URL: www.global-infotech.com
| |
| gary drummond 2007-03-17, 3:55 am |
| I wonder what the TX is for? US and Iowa is OK, but they are in CA...
Global Infotech Corporation wrote:
> We are looking for a Mainframe Data Architect with very good background in
> DB2 / IMS-DB, COBOL, JCL CICS etc Must have at least 6 or more years
> experience as a Mainframe Consultant.
>
> Pay Rate: US$ 41.25 - 49.50/hr (W2, No benefits or relocation assistance);
> final rate will be decided following interview
>
> Job Location is at Des Moines, IA
> Duration: 12 mths+
> Contact-to-hire option: Yes
> Residency Requirements: US citizens or US Permanent Residents or candidates
> eligible for employment in US for any employer, without any work visa
> sponsorship.
>
> If you are interested in exploring this opportunity or know of any
> acquaintance who may be, please forward this requirement to him / her.
>
> HOW TO APPLY: Interested applicants should reply to this posting, keeping
> the same "subject line"; only one MS Word resume (.DOC file) attachment
> accepted. Submitted resumes should include applicant's current physical
> location, availability, telephone no/e-mail ID, best time to call and
> expected salary rate beneath the name at the top of the resume. ** NO COVER
> LETTERS PLEASE **
>
>
> ABOUT GLOBAL INFOTECH CORPORATION
>
> Founded in 1996, Global Infotech (Global) is a US-based, IT services
> corporation with an unwavering focus on its customers' needs. Headquartered
> in the Silicon Valley of California, Global Infotech delivers high quality,
> high security and cost effective end-to-end software and hi-tech solutions
> to its customers that include Fortune 500, mid-sized companies and new
> economy businesses in North America.
>
> Since inception, Global continues to constantly deliver on its philosophy to
> be customer focused, technologically aligned, quality conscious, process
> driven and result oriented. Global has a knowledgeable and dedicated
> management team with vast experience and a successful track record spanning
> over the last three decades. The management team closely interacts with the
> customers to understand their current and long-term strategic goals and
> requirements to provide better service. For further details, please visit us
> at our URL: www.global-infotech.com
>
>
| |
| HeyBub 2007-03-17, 7:55 am |
| gary drummond wrote:
> I wonder what the TX is for? US and Iowa is OK, but they are in CA...
> Global Infotech Corporation wrote:
"Virginia is for lovers"
Texas is for warriors.
| |
|
| In article <12vnp1n9mj3i60a@news.supernews.com>,
HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>gary drummond wrote:
>
>"Virginia is for lovers"
>
>Texas is for warriors.
Without loving there would be no warriors to protect anyone, without
warriors to protect them there would be no lovers to carry on the species.
It is a wide world, with room for many... 'Anyone who imagines that all
fruits ripen the same time as strawberries knows nothing about grapes', as
Paracelsus said.
DD
| |
| HeyBub 2007-03-17, 6:55 pm |
| docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> In article <12vnp1n9mj3i60a@news.supernews.com>,
> HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Without loving there would be no warriors to protect anyone, without
> warriors to protect them there would be no lovers to carry on the
> species.
You confuse "love" with "sex."
| |
|
| In article <12votrm9kfm5n6d@news.supernews.com>,
HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>
>You confuse "love" with "sex."
I use a definition of an English word from a commonly-accepted source,
http://m-w.com/dictionary/lovers (4b). Perhaps a person from (place of
your choice, e.g., Texas) might find this confusing.
DD
| |
| Pete Dashwood 2007-03-18, 3:55 am |
|
"HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12votrm9kfm5n6d@news.supernews.com...
> docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>
> You confuse "love" with "sex."
>
He would be neither the first nor last person to do that, if he did, indeed
do that... :-)
Pete.
| |
| Michael Mattias 2007-03-18, 9:55 pm |
| > You confuse "love" with "sex."
That's a genetic thing, common to all humans having a "Y" chromosome.
Source: I think I heard that from a girlfriend. But I wasn't really paying
close attention to her at the time.
MCM
| |
| HeyBub 2007-03-18, 9:55 pm |
| X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 17
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.cobol:163674
Michael Mattias wrote:
>
> That's a genetic thing, common to all humans having a "Y" chromosome.
>
> Source: I think I heard that from a girlfriend. But I wasn't really
> paying close attention to her at the time.
Umm. I think your Y-deficient partner is mistaken. Women tend to equate love
and sex, men tend to separate the two.
For example:
Wrong: "But honey, it was just sex!"
Better: "But honey, I thought I loved her."
| |
| Michael Mattias 2007-03-18, 9:55 pm |
| "HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12vr0vm2qh0mo29@news.supernews.com...> Michael Mattias wrote:
>
> Umm. I think your Y-deficient partner is mistaken. Women tend to equate
> love and sex, men tend to separate the two.
>
I told you I wasn't paying close attention. Now that I am SURE is a
"Y-chromosome" thing....
MCM
| |
| Pete Dashwood 2007-03-18, 9:55 pm |
| X-Trace: individual.net 76nZaB1pYf7UvLsDeXbi7QebUUITi1lbGBPQwpI8
xBnrkZXcd4
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.cobol:163681
"Michael Mattias" <mmattias@talsystems.com> wrote in message
news:fXbLh.10862$jx3.1169@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>
> That's a genetic thing, common to all humans having a "Y" chromosome.
>
> Source: I think I heard that from a girlfriend. But I wasn't really paying
> close attention to her at the time.
>
> MCM
>
>
ROFL! Glad you're still with us, Michael :-)
| |
| Pete Dashwood 2007-03-18, 9:55 pm |
|
"HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12vr0vm2qh0mo29@news.supernews.com...
> Michael Mattias wrote:
>
> Umm. I think your Y-deficient partner is mistaken. Women tend to equate
> love and sex, men tend to separate the two.
>
> For example:
>
> Wrong: "But honey, it was just sex!"
> Better: "But honey, I thought I loved her."
That is wicked, Jerry... :-)
I have an almost irresistible urge to get out and try this one... I'd LOVE
to see the reaction...:-)
Pete.
| |
| HeyBub 2007-03-19, 6:55 pm |
| Pete Dashwood wrote:
>
> That is wicked, Jerry... :-)
>
> I have an almost irresistible urge to get out and try this one... I'd
> LOVE to see the reaction...:-)
Beware: "Better" doesn't mean your life won't be at risk.
You may be interested in the recent parable I discovered: The Lion and the
Sheep.
The Sheep wears a Lion costume and thinks he's a lion. The Lion wears a
sheep costume and knows she's a lion.
I just wish I had realized this truism many years ago. Excuse me while I
roar:
"BAAAA, BAAAA!"
| |
| Howard Brazee 2007-03-19, 6:55 pm |
| On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:40:06 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>He would be neither the first nor last person to do that, if he did, indeed
>do that... :-)
What I like is the people who confuse "oral" with "verbal" - which
explains why there is so much verbal sex going on.
| |
| Paul Robinson 2007-03-22, 9:55 pm |
| docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> In article <12vnp1n9mj3i60a@news.supernews.com>,
> HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Without loving there would be no warriors to protect anyone, without
> warriors to protect them there would be no lovers to carry on the species.
Well, it's interesting to note that while Virginia was running that ad
campaign, "Virginia is for Lovers", the Commonwealth still had a statute
on the books making it a crime to have sex with someone whom you're not
married to (§ 18.2-344).
Now how this ties into Texas: After the Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence
v. Texas that what gay people do in the privacy of their bedrooms is not
the state's business, a woman in Virginia by the name of Muguet Martin
sued her (presumably now ex-)boyfriend for knowingly giving her herpes.
The court said since fornication is a crime she can't sue him (you
can't sue someone else with whom you conspire to commit a crime). The
Virginia Supreme Court decided in Martin v. Ziherl that the state's law
against fornication was unconstitutional because of the decision in
Lawrence v. Texas (and the dissent in Bowers v. Hardwick, a decision of
the Supreme Court which Lawrence overturned.)
| |
| Paul Robinson 2007-03-22, 9:55 pm |
| Howard Brazee wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:40:06 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
> <dashwood@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> What I like is the people who confuse "oral" with "verbal" - which
> explains why there is so much verbal sex going on.
Let's not forget another word for "conversation" is "intercourse."
| |
|
| In article <ONKdnVMEU-K8oZ7bnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@cavtel.net>,
Paul Robinson <Paul@paul-robinson.us> wrote:
>docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>
>
>Well, it's interesting to note that while Virginia was running that ad
>campaign, "Virginia is for Lovers", the Commonwealth still had a statute
>on the books making it a crime to have sex with someone whom you're not
>married to (§ 18.2-344).
Mr Robinson, those who expect rational consistency in advertising have, at
times, been disappointed... and those who expect rational consistency from
government have, likewise, been disappointed...
.... so to expect a rational consistency between advertising *and*
government might lead to previously-demonstrated conclusions rather
rapidly.
DD
| |
|
|
|
|
|