For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > October 2007 > Re: "Substantive Changes"









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: "Substantive Changes"
William M. Klein

2007-10-09, 3:56 am

When IBM went from OS/VS COBOL to VS COBOL II, they dropped MANY of their
earlier extensions (e.g. TRANSFORM and ON statement) as well as '68 Standard
features (e.g. NOTE statement and EXAMINE). Micro Focus maintained (and
maintains) compatibility with OS/S COBOL as one of its dialects. Therefore, if
you turn on OSVS reserved words, EXAMINE will work - even if you aren't trying
to use Micro Focus extensions.

IBM also had (and has) automated tools for converting older (no longer
supported) syntax to newer syntax. If you can do an automated conversion and
use "new/ current Standard" syntax, I can't see any reason NOT to drop the older
forms.

--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Robert" <no@e.mail> wrote in message
news:huilg312u5a2hcvr2345ko48sjmeccp38m@
4ax.com...
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:56:33 -0600, LX-i <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
> Micro Focus retained the old forms. Why didn't IBM?



Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com