Home > Archive > Cobol > August 2006 > Debugging indicator/lines - 2002/2008 standards
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Debugging indicator/lines - 2002/2008 standards
|
|
| Roger While 2006-08-08, 3:55 am |
| In the 2002 standard, these are documented as
"will be deleted in the next revision". see. 6.3.4 and G.2.
However, exactly the same text appears verbatim everywhere
regarding debugging indicator/lines in the 2008 standard.
Oversight or deliberate ?
| |
| William M. Klein 2006-08-08, 6:55 pm |
| Roger,
Are you looking at the current draft, i.e.
"ISO/IEC 1989:200x WD 1.6 (E)"
The only place I see references to "debugging" in that is in the section
describing what has been removed.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message
news:eb9cg3$ne3$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> In the 2002 standard, these are documented as
> "will be deleted in the next revision". see. 6.3.4 and G.2.
>
> However, exactly the same text appears verbatim everywhere
> regarding debugging indicator/lines in the 2008 standard.
>
> Oversight or deliberate ?
>
>
| |
| Roger While 2006-08-09, 3:55 am |
| Well, I thought I was :-)
Obviously not.
Roger
"William M. Klein" <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:EG7Cg.337217$Zr.40166@fe06.news.easynews.com...
> Roger,
> Are you looking at the current draft, i.e.
>
> "ISO/IEC 1989:200x WD 1.6 (E)"
>
> The only place I see references to "debugging" in that is in the section
> describing what has been removed.
>
> --
> Bill Klein
> wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
> "Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message
> news:eb9cg3$ne3$01$1@news.t-online.com...
>
>
|
|
|
|
|