| William M. Klein 2006-08-04, 3:55 am |
| (I thought I had sent this CORRECTION to both IM-MAIN and comp.lang.cobol, but
apparently I didn't. Let me do so now). If you sent my earlier CLC note to any
SysProgs, PLEASE make certain that they get this correction. If you don't know
what SMP/E or who your (COBOL) SysProgs are, then this probably won't make much
difference to you. However, sorrty for the delay in getting the correction out.
****
Just to clarify (and explain my earlier "confusion").
I have now been told that the PTFs for both
PK15432 (LE)
and
PK16765 (Enterprise COBOL V3R4)
*do* have "correct" ++HOLD information. If you are interested in these PTFs (and
APARs) check out (long URL):
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docvie...s=UTF-8&lang=en
My confusion was that I assumed (erroneously) that as there were documentation
updates to go with changed behavior and new messages, that the document at:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-...helves/ZDOCAPAR
would have included appropriate SEARCH ALL information. Apparently, the PTFs
have ++HOLD ACTION and not DOC - so they aren't included in that. My error,
sorry about that.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
|