| Howard Brazee 2006-05-15, 6:55 pm |
| On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 02:28:44 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>Anyone who commits sexual crimes against children and women...
But not against men?
>or murders innocent people by acts of terrorism:
Why do we have to define whether it is terrorism? Nowadays every
war has the other side defined as "terrorists", with some
justification. It is the new "in" word. The enemy combatants are
still called cowards, even as they do brave things.
If someone murders innocent people by acts of greed, or acts of war,
or acts of terrorism, the result is the same, so why make the
distinction when picking punishments?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|