For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > April 2006 > Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only
Frank Swarbrick

2006-04-28, 6:55 pm

>>>> Howard Brazee<howard@brazee.net> 04/28/06 1:51 PM >>>
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:20:53 -0600, "Frank Swarbrick"
><Frank.Swarbrick@efirstbank.com> wrote:
>
any[color=darkred]
all[color=darkred]
>
>True. But I don't think many companies choose languages for
>financial applications. We choose financial applications and take
>the language(s) that come with them.
>
>The application companies have different criteria for selecting their
>language(s).


Well, in our case the company choosing the applications and the company
developing the applications are the same company. So to us the language
does matter. Is this not the case for many "COBOL shops"?

Frank

---
Frank Swarbrick
Senior Developer/Analyst - Mainframe Applications
FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO USA
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com