For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > April 2006 > Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on
Frank Swarbrick

2006-04-27, 6:55 pm

Pete Dashwood<dashwood@enternet.co.nz> 04/27/06 3:53 AM >>>
>
>"Ron S" <NoSpam@Spamblocker.org> wrote in message
>news:EqydnY8mA5Kbos3ZRVn_vA@giganews.com...
>
>I wouldn't worry about it... no one is committed to implementing COBOL 2002


>at the moment. By the time they do (if they do) you'll have converted
>everything to Java anyway... :-)


I know you were being a bit facetious, but do you honestly think that
converting, say, a batch transaction posting program to Java is a reasonable
thing to do?
And if not Java and not COBOL, then what?

Jus' wond'rin',
Frank


---
Frank Swarbrick
Senior Developer/Analyst - Mainframe Applications
FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO USA
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com