| Author |
DECLARATIVES and section/paragraph
|
|
| Roger While 2006-12-19, 3:55 am |
| Is the following legal ? I thought it was not but
now I am not so sure. (Section 14.3 2002)
DECLARATIVES.
MYSECTION SECTION.
USE ....
END DECLARATIVES.
MYPARAGRAPH.
Roger
| |
| Thomas 2006-12-19, 7:55 am |
|
Roger While schrieb:
> Is the following legal ? I thought it was not but
> now I am not so sure. (Section 14.3 2002)
>
> DECLARATIVES.
> MYSECTION SECTION.
> USE ....
> END DECLARATIVES.
> MYPARAGRAPH.
>
> Roger
Hi,
I think its legal, but perhaps you better use instead of MYPARAGRAPH a
section:
> END DECLARATIVES.
> MYSECTION SECTION.
Thomas
| |
| Rick Smith 2006-12-19, 7:55 am |
|
"Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message
news:em8ajd$9fa$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> Is the following legal ? I thought it was not but
> now I am not so sure. (Section 14.3 2002)
>
> DECLARATIVES.
> MYSECTION SECTION.
> USE ....
> END DECLARATIVES.
> MYPARAGRAPH.
Conforming? Not as I understand it. See 14.1.1, General
format, Format 1 (with-sections). Declaratives may appear
only in a procedure division structure with sections. I find
nothing in 14.3 to conflict with the general format, which
shows a section header following the declaratives.
| |
| William M. Klein 2006-12-19, 6:55 pm |
| I know that there have been discussions about allowing this as conforming, but
neither the '02 or draft of the next Standard allow for paragraphs without
sections following the END DECLARATIVE marker.
You MAY place *all) of the non-declarative code in a single "never referenced"
section, but it does still need to be in a SECTION to be conforming.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message
news:em8ajd$9fa$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> Is the following legal ? I thought it was not but
> now I am not so sure. (Section 14.3 2002)
>
> DECLARATIVES.
> MYSECTION SECTION.
> USE ....
> END DECLARATIVES.
> MYPARAGRAPH.
>
> Roger
>
|
|
|
|