For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > November 2006










Posts(1)November 29, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: Need to know how many volumes to allocate was Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was R
Posts(1)November 29, 2006, 9:55 pmNeed to know how many volumes to allocate was Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: F
Posts(1)November 29, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(10)November 29, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 29, 2006, 7:55 amRM/COBOL 6.61.00 for Linux and terminfo
Posts(3)November 29, 2006, 3:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Lander on C4
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Financial Times
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: my response to the harassment
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: BBC h2g2 online
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Bizarre magazine
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Observer article
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: .net magazine article
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Capital Radio - Chris Tarrant
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: cost of the operation
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: how and why did it start?
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: who knows about it?
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Bernard Levin expresses his views
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: Bernard Levin expresses his views
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: abuse in set-up situations and in public
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: bugging and counter-surveillance
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 6:55 pmMI5 Persecution: the BBC, television and radio
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 3:55 amCOBOL FAQ
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 3:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 28, 2006, 3:55 amare wombats good?
Posts(1)November 27, 2006, 9:55 pmwhere are wombats?
Posts(10)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Happy Thanksgiving!
Posts(1)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(3)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pmcobolc
Posts(15)November 27, 2006, 6:55 pm[OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
Posts(1)November 26, 2006, 6:55 pm<none>
Posts(1)November 26, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(8)November 26, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Happy Thanksgiving!
Posts(1)November 26, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(9)November 26, 2006, 3:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 25, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(16)November 25, 2006, 6:55 pmExamples of Web sites backed by COBOL
Posts(2)November 25, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 25, 2006, 7:55 amRe: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 25, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 25, 2006, 3:55 am[Very OT] waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 24, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Happy Thanksgiving!
Posts(1)November 24, 2006, 6:55 pmAcuODBC
Posts(1)November 24, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(2)November 23, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Happy Thanksgiving!
Posts(4)November 23, 2006, 3:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
Posts(7)November 22, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(9)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmReport help
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(36)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pm[OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 22, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(2)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 3:55 amRe: LOTR Spoiler
Posts(1)November 21, 2006, 3:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 20, 2006, 6:55 pmOT: LOTR Spoiler
Posts(1)November 20, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 20, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(2)November 20, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
Posts(1)November 20, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 20, 2006, 3:55 amCOBOL FAQ
Posts(3)November 18, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code)
Posts(6)November 17, 2006, 7:55 amJOB OPPORTUNITIES
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmAutocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on &q
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Autocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion o
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be main
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 16, 2006, 7:55 amRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 15, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 15, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
Posts(1)November 15, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 15, 2006, 6:55 pmIBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintain
Posts(21)November 15, 2006, 6:55 pmCANCEL Mis-behaving
Posts(1)November 14, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 14, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be
Posts(1)November 14, 2006, 6:55 pmCICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be mai
Posts(12)November 13, 2006, 6:55 pmLimit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
Posts(91)November 13, 2006, 6:55 pmadvice on books to learn cobol
Posts(96)November 13, 2006, 6:55 pmOT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(2)November 13, 2006, 4:00 amRealia COBOL
Posts(2)November 13, 2006, 12:39 amHelp, Realia Cobol problem with "ACCEPT" (from DOS screen)
Posts(6)November 12, 2006, 6:55 pmCSAML
Posts(1)November 12, 2006, 3:55 amCOBOL FAQ
Posts(1)November 11, 2006, 9:55 pmRe: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode
Posts(1)November 11, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO a
Posts(4)November 11, 2006, 6:55 pmFor Firefox users.
Posts(3)November 11, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on
Posts(1)November 10, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO a
Posts(1)November 10, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO a
Posts(1)November 10, 2006, 6:55 pmFurther discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO accep
Posts(3)November 10, 2006, 6:55 pmDisplay Line Position
Posts(2)November 10, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant
Posts(9)November 9, 2006, 9:55 pmCOBOL KEY SEGMENTS
Posts(1)November 9, 2006, 6:55 pmFirst Posting
Posts(5)November 9, 2006, 6:55 pmWeb site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(1)November 9, 2006, 6:55 pmNetExpess 3.0 calling MSMQ
Posts(2)November 9, 2006, 6:55 pm2 to 4 year project - Micro Focus Cobol - Apply with resume
Posts(1)November 9, 2006, 6:55 pmPublic domain was Re: advice on books to learn cobol
Posts(2)November 8, 2006, 6:55 pmWeb site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode
Posts(9)November 8, 2006, 6:55 pmVSAM Error Code 04
Posts(4)November 8, 2006, 6:55 pmFile Status 46 abend
Posts(1)November 7, 2006, 7:55 amRe: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(1)November 6, 2006, 9:55 pmThe All New Google Picasa Build 28.32 Final
Posts(16)November 6, 2006, 6:55 pmproblem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
Posts(1)November 6, 2006, 6:55 pmOT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(2)November 6, 2006, 7:55 amOT: Job References; are they any real value?
Posts(1)November 6, 2006, 3:40 amSony Grand WEGA KDFE42A10 42 in LCD Rear-Projection TV , $400
Posts(1)November 6, 2006, 3:39 amFor Sale Brand New Nokia N95 For Just $300
Posts(1)November 5, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Job References; are they any real value?
Posts(1)November 4, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Job References; are they any real value?
Posts(1)November 4, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Job References; are they any real value?
Posts(1)November 4, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Job References; are they any real value?
Posts(1)November 3, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(1)November 3, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
Posts(1)November 3, 2006, 3:55 amCOBOL FAQ
Posts(1)November 2, 2006, 6:55 pmRe: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output f
Posts(13)November 1, 2006, 6:55 pmSingle Source CICS/Batch
Posts(1)November 1, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output f
Posts(1)November 1, 2006, 7:55 amRe: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output f
Posts(1)November 1, 2006, 3:55 amRe: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output f
Posts(1)November 1, 2006, 3:55 amRe: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output f




Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com