Home > Archive > Cobol > November 2006 > Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something
|
|
|
| In article <FUT6h.281639$QZ1.108530@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
Arnold Trembley <arnold.trembley@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
[snip]
>The DD statement or
> IDCAMS define still specifies the primary and secondary allocation
>sizes.
Unless, I believe, one is going to tape/cart, in which case space
allocation is unnecessary. Having to know how many units to allocate for
the output run of a new program has, at times, been a... challenge; it is
at the core of the Zen of Programming question of 'How large is an output
dataset?'
DD
| |
| Mark Wallace 2006-11-20, 6:55 pm |
| docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> In article <1164042948.256610.100240@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Alistair <alistair@ld50macca.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> From
> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp...6b?dmode=source>
>
> --begin quoted text:
>
> Ahhhh, but remember... *every* shop will state, at some point, 'Well, what
> you says might have merit but we cannot do it that way... Things Are
> Different Here.'
>
> ... and, of course, if Tings Are Different everywhere then Things Are The
> Same everywhere.
>
> --end quoted text
>
> (please pardon the typographic error that made 'Tings' out of 'Things')
>
> ... and likewise, if Zen has never been The Same then Zen has always been
> The Same.
Plus ça change, plus zere iz ze same zen?
Ze mind, it boggles, bien sûr.
| |
|
| In article <ejt6ie$kov$1@aioe.server.aioe.org>,
Mark Wallace <mwallace@dse.nl> wrote:
>docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
><http://groups.google.com/group/comp...6b?dmode=source>
>
>Plus ça change, plus zere iz ze same zen?
If it has never been the same then it would be rather difficult to learn
whether the change is plus or minus.
>
>Ze mind, it boggles, bien sûr.
Only as long as it moves, even flaggingly.
DD
| |
| Mark Wallace 2006-11-21, 6:55 pm |
| docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> In article <ejt6ie$kov$1@aioe.server.aioe.org>,
> Mark Wallace <mwallace@dse.nl> wrote:
>
> If it has never been the same then it would be rather difficult to learn
> whether the change is plus or minus.
>
>
> Only as long as it moves, even flaggingly.
Co-incidentally, that's the first rule of French cuisine: If it moves,
eat it!
| |
| Mark Wallace 2006-11-22, 6:55 pm |
| Pete Dashwood wrote:
> "Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message
> news:l9s8m212q594enm301aarsgvisvvgad65m@
4ax.com...
>
> OK, even if I agreed with you, how does that explain the attitude?
Were you never a child?
Kids who had the 60p rip-off of an Action Man (GI Joe) went to great
lengths to prove that their piece of cheap tat was better than others'
expensive tat.
Childishness lasts a lifetime, but some people channel it better than
others.
| |
| Mark Wallace 2006-11-22, 6:55 pm |
| Pete Dashwood wrote:
> <docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:ejuk7s$8jn$1@reader2.panix.com...
> <snip>
>
> Is the flag waving, or is the flag stationary and the air waving?
>
> Truly, when the frog gets the lotus, the mountain goat will get kurtosis.
The first person who asks what the sound of one flag waving is will be
sentenced to 72 hours of non-stop Dubya speeches.
| |
| Donald Tees 2006-11-22, 9:55 pm |
| Pete Dashwood wrote:
> "Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message
> news:l9s8m212q594enm301aarsgvisvvgad65m@
4ax.com...
>
> OK, even if I agreed with you, how does that explain the attitude?
>
> Pete.
>
>
They probably mistake you for un anglais.
Donald
|
|
|
|
|