| Defaultuser 2006-01-09, 6:59 pm |
| "Oliver Wong" <owong@castortech.com> wrote in message
news:42Aqf.1798$m05.1599@clgrps12...
>
> "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:40ufi2F1c0rt8U1@individual.net...
>
> When matter and anti-matter come in contact, they transform into
> energy. So if the universe were compose of an equal amount of matter and
> anti matter, and if we brought all of that together, we'd end up with a
> large amount of energy. Assuming there is no such thing as "anti-energy",
> this doesn't result in a zero sum.
>
> I hadn't considered this before, so I'm not sure how (or if) the big
> bang theory addresses the issue of a non-zero sum. Guess I have another
> item to add to my w end-research checklist.
>
> - Oliver
Maybe they have invented mass-less anti-energy. And then if something else
breaks, they'll invent something else (or change their expected predictions
ex post facto which they do a lot) ....Physicists - they ares kind of like
the Dell helpdesk.
Of course - if you take all matter and anti-matter do you end up with
nothing? Or do you disappear back into totally symmetrical mexican hat
universe....just waiting for a rebel Higgs particle to say "Te veo más
tarde"...as he heads off to find the real God particle - and the cycle
begins....
DU
|