Home > Archive > Cobol > July 2005
| Posts(3) | July 29, 2005, 7:58 pm | Open Source COBOLs (was: Differences in data description in programm) | | Posts(6) | July 29, 2005, 4:59 pm | (IBM) LE for z/OS V1R7 | | Posts(16) | July 27, 2005, 9:59 pm | sequential file formats | | Posts(6) | July 27, 2005, 5:00 pm | Telecommute Contracting | | Posts(3) | July 27, 2005, 5:00 pm | Oracle CASE statement precompile error in Micro Focus | | Posts(2) | July 27, 2005, 3:59 am | MAKE LOADS OF MONEY FOR FREE | | Posts(1) | July 27, 2005, 3:59 am | COBOL FAQ | | Posts(1) | July 27, 2005, 3:59 am | about 16bit cobol migration to .net | | Posts(1) | July 26, 2005, 8:59 am | Re: Checking RACF for CICS TS | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: OT - "Source" was Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program us | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:02 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(2) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Called Module with File Access - where to Close | | Posts(8) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Called Module with File Access - where to Close | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | OT - "Source" was Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | OT: The "new" source code (was Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL p | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(3) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | When your end users insist on having a report writer, what do you use? | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 25, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 10:01 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | Re: Called Module with File Access - where to Close | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(3) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | COBOL FAQ | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragrap | | Posts(4) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | Re: Called Module with File Access - where to Close | | Posts(1) | July 24, 2005, 8:17 pm | Re: Called Module with File Access - where to Close |
|
|