For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > April 2005 > Re: COBOL and XML (was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error")









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: COBOL and XML (was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error")
Richard

2005-04-25, 8:55 pm

> users put enough "pressure" on their
> vendors to spend significant resources on developing (and already)

delivering
> "native language support" for XML in COBOL.


I can understand why that is. In many cases the interchange of data is
being done via commercial EDIFACT translators or similar mechanisms
which are hugely complex and expensive. They probably think that
having XML as part of the language will solve all the problems, and get
rid of much expense.

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com