Cobol - Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were i

You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author

Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were i

William M. Klein

2004-09-28, 3:55 am

IBM does provide exploitation of its 64-bit architecture for those products that
they think there is an advantage for such.

--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Robert Wagner" <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote in message
news:tc4gl0h5asf9bqq5mbabi22f51smgmpltk@
4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:18:47 GMT, "William M. Klein"
> <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
> When IBM said LE, I assumed that meant 64-bit. There is little point
> in paying for a 64-bit machine, then failing to use the extra
> capacity.

Sponsored Links