For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > September 2004 > Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were i









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were i
Robert Wagner

2004-09-28, 3:55 am

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:18:47 GMT, "William M. Klein"
<wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:

>"Robert Wagner" <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote in message
> news:culel0161kn9jkaek60qgk093s5c1vbm76@
4ax.com...
><snip>
>
>Wrong, Very WRONG, without any supporting information,
>
>(In fact there the current IBM response to user request to provide a 64-bit
>compiler for z/OS has varied from negative to semi-negative.)


When IBM said LE, I assumed that meant 64-bit. There is little point
in paying for a 64-bit machine, then failing to use the extra
capacity.
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com