For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > September 2004 > Procedural v OO Collections









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Procedural v OO Collections
James J. Gavan

2004-09-24, 3:55 pm

Robert Wagner wrote:

>Morons post _opinions_. In the case of Micro Focus' Collection
>classes, I posted verifiable _facts_ about their slow speed and also
>verifiable code that runs 50 times faster.
>
>One fact trumps a fist-full of opinions .. at least in the world of
>reason.
>
>


Because you have concluded in your own mind that your *approach* proved
it - it aint necessarily so. And as others have pointed out to you many
times, your own particular reasoning quite frequently contains some
serious flaws.

Please, so I can check on what you actually did, refer me back to the
two messages, where you posted the original Procedural and then the
Collection version. I'm not here to *defend* Micro Focus collections -
that's their job. But I would like to check back on your two programs.
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com