For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > July 2004 > Re: UnDead languages?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: UnDead languages?
E. Robert Tisdale

2004-07-08, 8:55 pm

Michael Metcalf wrote:

> I just happened to hear an editor of the new edition of the Concise Oxford
> English Dictionary say on the radio that obsolete words get removed to make
> way for new ones. Her two examples were Snobol and Cobol.
> Is this a valid definition of a dead computing language?


No.
These are *undead* languages.
They are uncertain about their final destination --
computer programming language heaven or hell --
so they persist in a partially decomposed state.
They are zombie languages.
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com