| Howard Brazee 2004-06-28, 3:55 pm |
|
On 25-Jun-2004, "JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote:
> Sure. Why not? The amount of defective code in Windows is an unmeasurably
> small percentage of the total. Besides, your four questions have to be
> answered in the affirmative regarding Windows.
I don't care what percentage of code is wrong - I want my paycheck to be
correct.
Which it is - the program is written in CoBOL though, so it must be lower
quality than systems software which has been known to fail.
So by what standard are you using to define that that program isn't close to the
quality of my operating system? It appears that you are measuring percentage
of errors per code. If there is enough code to make the errors/line low enough
that is good enough so that the fact that my payroll program has no errors
doesn't matter. It must be some other criterion or criteria which make the
OS's software so much better.
|