For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Cobol > April 2004 > MicroFocus COBOL .Net









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author MicroFocus COBOL .Net
Me

2004-04-19, 6:30 am

Anyone been using it yet?


James J. Gavan

2004-04-19, 1:30 pm

Me wrote:

>Anyone been using it yet?
>
>
>
>

Yes , but not me. Go to Micro Focus sit and sign-up for Answer Exchange.
Ask the same
question there and any specifics you are interested in.
LX-i

2004-04-19, 8:30 pm

Me wrote:
> Anyone been using it yet?


I'm sure someone has.


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ / \ / ~ Live from Montgomery, AL! ~
~ / \/ o ~ ~
~ / /\ - | ~ LXi0007@Netscape.net ~
~ _____ / \ | ~ http://www.knology.net/~mopsmom/daniel ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I do not read e-mail at the above address ~
~ Please see website if you wish to contact me privately ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Joe Zitzelberger

2004-04-21, 10:30 pm

In article <1088oc0jh8oo7df@corp.supernews.com>,
LX-i <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote:

> Me wrote:
>
> I'm sure someone has.


Any idea how hard is it to get each field in a group item to appear as a
property?
Scot Nielsen

2004-04-22, 6:30 am

Joe, you need to use the keyword PROPERTY on each field.
Something like:
01 GROUP-ITEM.
03 field1 PIC X(5) PROPERTY.

Which would expose the pic x as a System.String object called "FIELD1".
You can sepcify the exact case of the property using the following:
03 field1 PIC X(5) PROPERTY AS "Field1"

Regards, Scot


"Joe Zitzelberger" <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:joe_zitzelberger-106292.21335821042004@corp.supernews.com...
> In article <1088oc0jh8oo7df@corp.supernews.com>,
> LX-i <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
> Any idea how hard is it to get each field in a group item to appear as a
> property?




Joe Zitzelberger

2004-04-23, 8:30 am


Oh well. I was going to use it to create a GUI control from a copybook
using introspection.

But if I have to do more than wrap the copybook in a dummy class and do
a dynamic compile then I might as well write a copybook parser and do it
that way.

Thanks for the info...

In article <c67vor$toq$1@hyperion.microfocus.com>,
"Scot Nielsen" <a.b@c.com> wrote:

> Joe, you need to use the keyword PROPERTY on each field.
> Something like:
> 01 GROUP-ITEM.
> 03 field1 PIC X(5) PROPERTY.
>
> Which would expose the pic x as a System.String object called "FIELD1".
> You can sepcify the exact case of the property using the following:
> 03 field1 PIC X(5) PROPERTY AS "Field1"
>
> Regards, Scot
>
>
> "Joe Zitzelberger" <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:joe_zitzelberger-106292.21335821042004@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
>

William M. Klein

2004-04-23, 10:30 am

Assuming you don't have any odd (COMP-1, or index) type data items, you might
think about doing a

Copy whatever replacing ==PIC== by == Property Pic==.

That would seem pretty easy to me - and should assign "property" to all the
elementary items.

--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Joe Zitzelberger" <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:joe_zitzelberger-DD2073.07131723042004@corp.supernews.com...[color=darkred]
>
> Oh well. I was going to use it to create a GUI control from a copybook
> using introspection.
>
> But if I have to do more than wrap the copybook in a dummy class and do
> a dynamic compile then I might as well write a copybook parser and do it
> that way.
>
> Thanks for the info...
>
> In article <c67vor$toq$1@hyperion.microfocus.com>,
> "Scot Nielsen" <a.b@c.com> wrote:
>


LX-i

2004-04-26, 11:30 pm

Joe Zitzelberger wrote:
> In article <1088oc0jh8oo7df@corp.supernews.com>,
> LX-i <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Any idea how hard is it to get each field in a group item to appear as a
> property?


I'd say it's pretty hard the first time, but after that it's a piece of
cake. :)


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ / \ / ~ Live from Montgomery, AL! ~
~ / \/ o ~ ~
~ / /\ - | ~ LXi0007@Netscape.net ~
~ _____ / \ | ~ http://www.knology.net/~mopsmom/daniel ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I do not read e-mail at the above address ~
~ Please see website if you wish to contact me privately ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Joe Zitzelberger

2004-04-26, 11:31 pm

Doh! Thanks -- I was so wrapped up in wrapping a few template lines
around my copybook that I completely forgot the copy command.


In article <Ij9ic.6168$eZ5.4421@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"William M. Klein" <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:

> Assuming you don't have any odd (COMP-1, or index) type data items, you might
> think about doing a
>
> Copy whatever replacing ==PIC== by == Property Pic==.
>
> That would seem pretty easy to me - and should assign "property" to all the
> elementary items.
>
> --
> Bill Klein
> wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
> "Joe Zitzelberger" <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:joe_zitzelberger-DD2073.07131723042004@corp.supernews.com...
>
>

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com