|
|
|
| I was converting a 35 year old OS Cobol program to
Enterprise Cobol today. All the CLOSE statements in
this program had CLOSE file-name WITH DISP. I don't
happen to have a 35 year old manual and this is not
valid for Enterprise Cobol. Does anyone remember
what CLOSE WITH DISP was supposed to do?
| |
| William M. Klein 2004-04-05, 7:30 pm |
| Page 443 of the OS/VS COBOL program says that "CLOSE WITH DISP" means to use
whatever is on the DISP parameter of the JCL - so it sounds like you can just
remove it and things should work "as expected".
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Ron S" <SpamStopper@NoSpam.Org> wrote in message
news:kPidnT8JnsQ3TuzdRVn_vQ@giganews.com...
> I was converting a 35 year old OS Cobol program to
> Enterprise Cobol today. All the CLOSE statements in
> this program had CLOSE file-name WITH DISP. I don't
> happen to have a 35 year old manual and this is not
> valid for Enterprise Cobol. Does anyone remember
> what CLOSE WITH DISP was supposed to do?
>
>
| |
| Ron S 2004-04-05, 10:30 pm |
| > Page 443 of the OS/VS COBOL program says that "CLOSE WITH DISP" means to use
> whatever is on the DISP parameter of the JCL - so it sounds like you can just
> remove it and things should work "as expected".
>
Thanks. I did remove it and all was well but I was just curious as to what its
purpose was years ago. Not much, it would seem.
| |
| Donald Tees 2004-04-10, 6:30 am |
| Ron S wrote:
>
>
> Thanks. I did remove it and all was well but I was just curious as to what its
> purpose was years ago. Not much, it would seem.
>
>
As a PS to that, it is too bad that some of those old tape methods left
Cobol. They would work very well for things like CD"s and DVD's on a
PC, for example. With properly working label records and mount dismount
close commands, someone could actually do proper backup of data without
leaving Cobol. The Rewritable DVD is quite a neat device. I think it
will be arround for a while, at least as a prototype.
Donald
| |
| Donald Tees 2004-04-10, 1:30 pm |
| Ron S wrote:
>
>
> Thanks. I did remove it and all was well but I was just curious as to what its
> purpose was years ago. Not much, it would seem.
>
>
A wag ... close with rewind vs close with dismount type of thing at the
JCL level?
Donald
|
|
|
|