| Nelson Kaye 2006-07-23, 6:55 pm |
| Thansk for the responses.
I agree that for certain name changes it is good (perhaps important) to know
the original.
I find, however, in working with report coding, that many #ORIG make the
entry a 2-liner, and I find it easier to work with the coding without #ORIG.
Therefore, in many cses, I find myself deleting it for ease of further
report editing.
Nelson
"Arnor Baldvinsson" <arnor@icetips.com> wrote in message
news:44c3a828.2157492@news.softvelocity.com...
> Hi Nelson,
>
> On 23 Jul 2006 05:56:14 -0400, "Nelson Kaye" <nkaye1@nyc.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> What is the problem with #ORIG? It is used to create a reference to
> the original control name in case templates need to find it, made
> available in the %ControlOriginal symbol. This makes it possible for
> example to find ?INSERT button even if you change it to ?ADD because
> then the ?ADD button would have #ORIG(?INSERT) attached to it and you
> can loop through the controls and check the %ControlOriginal label to
> match ?INSERT.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arnór Baldvinsson
> Icetips Software
> San Antonio, Texas, USA
> www.icetips.com
> arnor@icetips.com
>
> Subscribe to information from Icetips.com:
> http://www.icetips.com/subscribe.php
>
|